What does it examine?
- Title — its length, and whether it contains what people will search for.
- Meta description — whether there is one at all, and whether it fits the length the results list prints.
- Subheading structure — whether there is segmentation, and whether the hierarchy is logical.
- Keyword use — whether it appears naturally rather than being overused.
- Internal links — whether the piece connects to the rest of your content.
- Image alt text — whether it exists, and whether it describes.
- Readability — sentence and paragraph length.
Which suggestion is worth acting on?
| Suggestion | Worth how much? | How long? |
|---|---|---|
| Writing a missing meta description | A lot: this is what appears in the results list. | 1 minute |
| Shortening an over-long title | A lot: a truncated title says less. | 1 minute |
| Filling in missing alt text | Moderate — but required for accessibility. | 1 minute |
| Adding an internal link | A lot, if there is something to link to. | 2–3 minutes |
| Reorganising subheadings | Moderate; a lot on a long article. | 5 minutes |
| Fine-tuning keyword density | Little. Do not write for the number. | — |
Why can I not see the SEO feedback?
Because it starts at Starter. On Free, content is produced and editable, but the SEO feedback does not appear.
Does it fix the problems automatically?
No, it suggests. The reason is that most suggestions are editorial decisions — shortening a title asks what the point is, and you know the answer.
How does this relate to SEO/GEO research?
SEO feedback examines ONE piece while you edit. SEO/GEO research analyses your whole online presence: competitors, content gaps, visibility inside AI answers.